— for the fruitful conversations Logout
Please consider upgrading to a newer version of Internet Explorer (or install Google Chrome, it's even faster).
  1. Forum
  2. Sandbox (test forum)

Demo

By KajMagnus, 2012-04-23 06:57:52Z, improved , 2013-06-09 14:36:33Z

Do this:

  1. Scroll: click and hold left mouse button on the white background, and drag the mouse leftwards, upwards, with the mouse button held down.

  2. Scroll down to the Example Discussion below. Note how much text you don't need to read: pointless comments are collapsed — they don't waste your time.

  3. Think about whether interesting comments are sorted to the upper left, and boring comments appear far away to the right. — The intention is that you find the most interesting comments first, when you start reading.
    (Imagine the example discussion below, but moved to a "normal" forum: one single flat column, replies sorted by time — it would be unreadable. All you found wold be "Test", "Testing", "Test test" comments. But with Debiki, you quickly find what you're looking for.)

  4. Test to leave a reply: click Reply.

  5. Suggest an improvement. Click on this text (anywhere) and select Improve. Then you will be able to edit this text, and submit an improvement suggestion to the author of this page (that is, to me). You are using an old browser. If you had had a modern browser, you would have been able to click this text, edit it and submit your change as an improvement suggestion. Here you can download a newer browser. Internet Explorer version 9 and above works.

  6. Have a look at other demo pages:

  7. Download and install Debiki on your own server. It's open source.

Example Discussion

Topic: Which animal species is the kindest species in the world?

What's your opinion?

211 comments Logout
  1. Reply Like? More ×2
  2. By Anonymous?, 2012-12-09 11:20:31Z#196654, flagged copyright violation, rated interesting
    1 flags:
    1. copyright violation × 1
    4 ratings:
    1. interesting 100%

    Dolphins.

    They have no arms and can do no evil. And they are intelligent, and always smile :-)

    Well, that wasn't entirely true. — They are bullying each other sometimes. And although they many times have saved humans from drowning, or from sharks, they have also actually killed humans — some poor fellow that surprised them by jumping from the boat down in the middle of them.

    1. Click to show this thread
    2. By blah?, 2013-03-24 16:52:07Z#263904, rated funny?
      1 ratings:
      1. funny 100%

      I like dolphins

      1. By Anonymous??, 2013-07-05 01:15:29Z#114

        I like dolphins too

        1. By Anonymous??, 2013-08-02 13:14:40Z#123

          they swym

          1. By Anonymous??, 2013-08-02 13:14:52Z#124

            fast

        2. By Anonymous??, 2013-08-02 13:15:14Z#125

          they jump

          1. By da??, 2013-08-11 21:45:53Z#127

            impresionante!

        3. By Anonymous??, 2014-01-11 21:32:02Z#140

          lol

      2. Click to show this thread
      3. By Anonymous??, 2013-05-06 21:32:54Z#464055

        Dolphins are the greatest.

        1. By Piotr, 2013-06-13 14:07:29Z#103

          Indeed.

    3. Click to show this thread
    4. Click to show this thread
    5. By Anonymous??, 2013-02-20 06:03:30Z#115640, rated faulty
      3 ratings:
      1. faulty 67%
      2. off-topic 33%

      what about bears?

      1. By KajMagnus, 2013-02-23 09:09:29Z#259538, rated faulty, improved , 2013-02-23 09:13:52Z
        2 ratings:
        1. faulty 100%

        Grizzly bears and polar bears are not particularily kind, actually. As far as I've seen on TV, male bears kill (and eat?) their own children, if they happen to find them.

        1. Click to show this thread
        2. Click to show this thread
  3. By KajMagnus, 2012-04-23 07:26:48Z#262830, rated interesting, improved , 2012-04-23 07:29:32Z
    6 ratings:
    1. interesting 90%
    2. faulty 10%
    3. off-topic 10%
    4. mediocre 10%

    Humans?

    It's the kindest and cruelest species

    1. By Anonymous??, 2013-03-24 06:26:26Z#140886, rated interesting?
      1 ratings:
      1. interesting 100%

      Agreed!

      1. Click to show this thread
    2. By Anonymous??, 2014-02-10 01:52:21Z#152, improved , 2014-02-10 01:52:49Z

      Are you sure it's also the kindest? Most of the time we're being kind is when we're trying to fix our own or somebody else's cruelty.

      Like helping the homeless is kind. But the reason they're homeless is most likely due to other people's cruelty.

    3. By Anonymous??, 2013-03-24 05:30:10Z#388659

      Also the most dangerous game.

      1. By KajMagnus, 2013-03-26 17:47:17Z#13

        What species are you?

        1. By A Nonymous?, 2013-06-06 11:54:39Z#102

          Human

      2. Click to show this thread
    4. By Anonymous??, 2012-11-23 21:37:53Z#21866, rated off-topic
      1 ratings:
      1. off-topic 100%

      Interesting potential with this idea. Keep it up!

      1. Click to show this thread
    5. Click to show this thread
    6. Click to show this thread
    7. Click to show this thread
  4. By Anonymous?, 2013-03-24 02:24:17Z#253256, rated interesting
    2 ratings:
    1. interesting 100%

    It's very annoying to scroll to the right so far to see new comments...

    1. By Anonymous??, 2013-06-28 12:41:24Z#110

      true

      1. By Anonymous??, 2013-06-29 16:49:59Z#111

        agree

    2. By KajMagnus, 2013-06-30 06:20:36Z#112, improved , 2013-06-30 06:28:00Z

      You're drag-scrolling with the mouse? (I.e. clicking and dragging on the white background)

      You would have had to scroll an even longer distance, downwards, had everything been placed in a single 1D column. (Isn't that worse? I think)

      It's a problem, however, I agree — and now I'm thinking about [replies-to-the-OP that don't get any replies themselves]. They make the page very very wide, leaving it mostly blank.

      Illustration: (the two rightmost replies are problematic because they make the page too wide. I wonder how that can be fixed?? Placing them on top of each other somehow?)

      [the Original Post]
      [....             ]
      \
       `+--------+----------------+-------–...
        [Reply]  [Reply with no]  [Another ]
        |        [replies, bad ]  [one, bad]
        [Re. 2]
        [Good ]
        |
        [Re. 3]
        [...  ]
      
      1. By Anonymous??, 2013-07-07 01:38:31Z#117

        You could tab the comments, eg with twitter bootstrap tabs,

        left tab - most interesting (or newest/oldest) center tab - less interesting right tab - least interesting

        Would also solve the problem of having to scroll right, especially on smaller screens.

        1. By Anonymous??, 2013-07-07 01:52:12Z#118

          Also, the arrows make little sense with the comments already nested. The arrow distract from the content. Most people should be familiar with nested comments anyway.

          1. By KajMagnus, 2013-07-11 08:40:50Z#120, improved , 2013-07-11 08:42:20Z

            That is true. I think the arrows are really only helpful when the replies "branch out", I mean, when there are >= 2 replies to a comment.

            (Someone else has also suggested that.)

          2. By KajMagnus, 2013-10-13 01:46:42Z#133

            I've removed most arrows now, and only kept arrows that are actually needed (which they are if there are many replies to a reply, since the layout isn't the standard nested comment layout: the last reply isn't indented).

        2. By KajMagnus, 2013-07-11 08:39:51Z#119

          That cold work unless there are too many replies to the root post. For example, on this page, there are 36 direct root post replies — then there would be 36 tabs?

          Perhaps it's possible to make it work anyway, by showing only the next 3 tabs or something like that.

          I'm afraid some people wouldn't realize that they were supposed to click on the tabs to find more comments.

  5. By Kitty overlord??, 2013-02-19 09:38:35Z#640363, rated interesting?, improved by KajMagnus, 2013-03-06 07:19:44Z
    2 ratings:
    1. interesting 67%
    2. funny 33%
    3. off-topic 33%

    Kittens

    Cats!

    Just kidding.

    1. By KajMagnus, 2013-03-03 07:02:20Z#2, rated interesting?, improved , 2013-03-05 13:21:43Z
      1 ratings:
      1. interesting 100%

      Cats eat birds. But what about kittens? They are cute and drink milk instead

      1. Click to show this thread
      2. Click to show this thread
  6. By SDFdsfew?, 2013-05-30 05:14:06Z#85, rated interesting
    1 ratings:
    1. interesting 100%

    Trying

    1. By KajMagnus, 2013-06-14 09:05:42Z#104, rated interesting?
      1 ratings:
      1. interesting 100%

      Hi SDFdsfew, I think I've somewhat fixed the problem with too deep indentation of nested comments. Thanks for giving me a good example case to test on :-)

      If you have time, I wrote a blog post about fixing the problem with too deep indentation.

    2. By SDFdsfew?, 2013-05-30 05:14:23Z#86

      Trying again

      1. By SDFdsfew?, 2013-05-30 05:14:44Z#87

        Just trying

        1. By SDFdsfew?, 2013-05-30 05:14:57Z#88

          Another trying

          1. By SDFdsfew?, 2013-05-30 05:15:07Z#89

            Again another trying

            1. By SDFdsfew?, 2013-05-30 05:15:29Z#90

              Well why not another try?

              1. By SDFdsfew?, 2013-05-30 05:15:40Z#91

                Somemore trying

                1. By SDFdsfew?, 2013-05-30 05:16:01Z#92

                  Retrying... Retrying... Retrying... Retrying...

                  1. By SDFdsfew?, 2013-05-30 05:16:24Z#93

                    How deep my trying will go...

                    1. By SDFdsfew?, 2013-05-30 05:17:07Z#94

                      Retrying as deep as i can...

                      1. By SDFdsfew?, 2013-05-30 05:17:59Z#95

                        Keep trying to digg

                        1. By SDFdsfew?, 2013-05-30 05:18:40Z#96

                          Keep trying to digggg

                          1. By SDFdsfew?, 2013-05-30 05:18:58Z#97

                            Digging some more

                  2. By SDFdsfew?, 2013-05-30 05:20:21Z#99

                    Spamming!!!

            2. By SDFdsfew?, 2013-05-30 05:20:44Z#100

              okay i'm blur

      2. By SDFdsfew?, 2013-05-30 05:20:03Z#98

        Hmnn.. what?

  7. By Anonymous??, 2013-03-24 06:55:44Z#147737, rated interesting
    1 ratings:
    1. interesting 100%

    OMG does this work?

    1. By Anonymous??, 2014-02-09 18:14:26Z#148

      This is a very novel approach to the problems w/ discussion threads

  8. By Anonymous??, 2013-02-21 02:16:40Z#147438, rated interesting?
    6 ratings:
    1. interesting 45%
    2. off-topic 44%
    3. mediocre 11%

    Horizontal and vertical scrolling? No thank you.

    1. By Dmitri??, 2013-03-24 03:24:24Z#194956, rated funny
      2 ratings:
      1. funny 91%
      2. interesting 9%

      It works pretty great with a MacBook's trackpad (via two-finger scrolling).

      1. By Anonymous??, 2013-03-26 21:55:55Z#15

        I was just thinking this!

    2. By Anonymous??, 2013-03-24 05:28:36Z#187654, improved by KajMagnus, 2013-03-26 17:50:04Z

      Agreed, it is annoying

    3. Click to show this thread
  9. By Anonymous??, 2013-03-24 01:57:04Z#148488, rated mediocre?, interesting?
    2 ratings:
    1. mediocre 50%
    2. interesting 50%

    Dogs

    1. By KajMagnus, 2013-07-24 20:01:38Z#121

      But dogs eat cats

  10. By t??, 2013-05-10 15:02:34Z#787928, rated funny?
    1 ratings:
    1. funny 100%

    what's "an animal" anyway?

    1. By me??, 2013-11-04 00:11:21Z#135

      Is NOT human

  11. By Cicero??, 2012-07-24 11:59:45Z#255527, rated off-topic
    3 ratings:
    1. off-topic 67%
    2. interesting 33%

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

    Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.

    1. By Anonymous??, 2013-02-13 01:25:58Z#849361, rated funny
      1 ratings:
      1. funny 100%

      Lorizzle ipsizzle dolor shizzle my nizzle crocodizzle i saw beyonces tizzles and my pizzle went crizzle, shizzlin dizzle adipiscing elit. Nullizzle boofron velit, for sure volutpizzle, suscipizzle quizzle, break it down vizzle, arcu. Fo uhuh ... yih! tortizzle. Ma nizzle erizzle. Fusce at dolizzle dapibizzle break yo neck, yall bling bling boofron. Gangsta pellentesque nibh crunk turpizzle. Fo shizzle my nizzle in tortizzle. Pellentesque away away own yo'. In hizzle get down get down crunk dictumst. Donec dapibus. Curabitizzle tellizzle shizznit, pretizzle owned, mattis ac, dang vitae, nunc. We gonna chung suscipizzle. Pizzle sempizzle shut the shizzle up sed purus.

      1. By Keth??, 2013-03-15 19:51:32Z#9

        Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.

    2. By Cicero??, 2012-07-24 12:00:26Z#201703

      Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

      1. By Cicero??, 2012-07-24 12:00:37Z#21328

        Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit!

        Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua!

        1. By Cicero??, 2012-07-24 12:01:25Z#180490

          Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit

          1. By Keth??, 2013-03-15 19:52:45Z#133977

            cececec

      2. By Cicero??, 2012-07-24 12:01:12Z#181411

        Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

        1. By Anonymous?, 2012-11-12 18:44:20Z#211085

          Häruptur förstårum jagitin intemporum särskoligumt myximalcket!

    3. By Cicero??, 2012-07-24 12:00:51Z#198275, rated mediocre
      2 ratings:
      1. mediocre 83%
      2. funny 17%
      3. interesting 17%
      4. boring 17%
      5. off-topic 17%
      6. stupid 17%

      Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

      Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.

  12. By Anonymous??, 2014-01-11 21:35:17Z#141, rated funny?, mediocre?, interesting?
    1 ratings:
    1. funny 100%
    2. mediocre 100%
    3. interesting 100%

    Hmmmm...

  13. By da??, 2013-08-11 21:48:18Z#128

    mi opinion giles!

  14. By Anonymous??, 2013-10-10 05:12:29Z#131

    What?

    1. By KajMagnus, 2013-10-11 16:18:53Z#132

      What?

  15. By Anonymous?, 2013-12-23 23:31:05Z#139

    reaaly cool interface!

  16. By Ryan??, 2013-03-24 01:29:43Z#110531

    Another really cool feature—my computer seems to be "reading" the comments at a different pace based on character count?

  17. By Anonymous??, 2013-03-24 10:44:52Z#116979

    this is fantastic

    1. By Anonymous??, 2013-03-24 10:45:21Z#129546

      replying to my own comment

      1. By Anonymous??, 2013-08-02 13:09:46Z#122

        fzzdzzd

      2. By Anonymous??, 2013-03-24 10:46:12Z#227895

        indenting again ... this can only work so many times given fixed column space for mobile layout lets see...

        1. By Anonymous??, 2013-03-24 10:46:20Z#137918

          and again

          1. By Anonymous??, 2013-03-27 16:53:18Z#16

            Iguess the idea is that you can split off time and time again

          2. By Anonymous??, 2013-03-24 10:46:27Z#124342

            and again

            1. By Anonymous??, 2013-03-24 10:46:43Z#789204

              and again the problem is solved neatly before posting but on posting

              1. By Anonymous??, 2013-03-24 10:47:33Z#396391

                well there isnt much you can do about it ... and in real life such nesting is not useful... in fact, have you considered not nesting at all --> one column is one "initial comment plus all replies"?

                1. By KajMagnus, 2013-03-28 10:43:13Z#17, improved , 2013-06-11 07:56:09Z

                  Hmm, not much. I've thought about not increasing the indentation level, if there's only one reply, however.

                  I think one could restrict nesting depending on how wide the column is. I don't know if you've noticed that you can resize the column — if you hover this column with the mouse, a "resizable vertical line handle" appears.

                  Ooops this one is definitively too deeply nested :-(

                  Edit: Now I've mitigated the problem with too deep indentation :-) /Edit (June 2013)

  18. By V?, 2013-03-31 12:48:38Z#183170

    Everything is wonderful. But! You do not have instructions on how to connect it. This is not correct.

    Thanks. V.

    1. By Anonymous??, 2013-12-13 13:16:54Z#138

      hello this is not really wonderful, but nice

    2. By KajMagnus, 2013-04-02 12:02:48Z#203158

      Re: "instructions on how to connect it" — what are you referring to? "it"? :-)

      1. By V?, 2013-04-02 17:00:15Z#253008

        I mean your script cursor control. No lessons or instructions. Thanks. V.

        1. By KajMagnus, 2013-06-06 09:05:03Z#101

          (Sorry for the very late reply)

          Oh you mean Utterscroll, the dragscroll script? Please find instructions here: https://github.com/debiki/utterscroll

          1. By Fedol?, 2013-11-03 11:39:08Z#134

            I tried the Script, but i'm getting an error

            TypeError: $viewportGhost.offset(...) is null

            using - jQuery 1.7.2 - modernizr - jquery scrollable - utterscroll

            can u help plz?

            1. By KajMagnus, 2013-11-06 04:28:19Z#136, improved , 2013-12-05 01:39:08Z

              [Edit] Old somewhat incorrect comment, please see my more recent comment instead, with a link to an example HTML file. [/Edit]

              Hi Fedol,

              Do you wait with running Utterscroll until the document has been loaded? Otherwise document.body might be null I think, which would result in the error you're seeing.

              I created a JsFiddle here: (but it doesn't work as I would have expected)

              http://jsfiddle.net/nZa2K/

              and document.body is null, therefore $viewportGhost.offset() becomes null. I wonder why document.body is null, because JSFiddle does wait with running the Javascript code until the document has been loaded:

              //<![CDATA[ 
              $(window).load(function(){
              debiki.Utterscroll.enable();
              });//]]>  
              

              Right now I'm thinking that the problem is somehow related to the script being run in an <iframe> inside e.g. JsFiddle, and/or that you should wait with calling Utterscroll until after the document has been loaded. (If that's the problem, I should document it.)

            2. By KajMagnus, 2013-12-05 01:36:30Z#137, improved , 2013-12-05 01:40:53Z

              Hi again, here is a small example HTML file that shows how you can use Utterscroll. I wasn't aware about this, but currently one needs to load Utterscroll at the bottom of the HTML page (or load it lazily on the page load event).

              The example is linked from https://github.com/debiki/utterscroll too.

  19. By Ryan??, 2013-03-24 01:23:44Z#220252

    Super interesting work. My only note relates to a widescreen monitor—I tend to read the inner-most (2) columns versus the outer-most-left column (after scrolling a bit). Either way, great explorations and documentation.

  20. By Anonymous??, 2013-03-24 06:55:18Z#568650

    xzcxc

  21. By Anonymous??, 2013-03-24 03:33:28Z#920730, improved , 2013-03-25 09:17:44Z

    It does it a little fast for the starting entries

    1. By Anonymous??, 2013-03-24 03:33:41Z#354013

      *It

  22. By Anonymous?, 2012-07-30 03:42:24Z#354624, rated off-topic?, improved , 2012-07-30 03:43:32Z
    5 ratings:
    1. off-topic 49%
    2. interesting 27%
    3. boring 24%

    The Dodo bird

    It's extinct now though

    1. By Anonymous??, 2014-01-17 03:15:38Z#143

      test

    2. Click to show this thread
    3. Click to show this comment
      1. Click to show this thread
      2. By Anonymous??, 2012-08-08 18:08:37Z#220985

        Interesting idea.

        1. By Anonymous??, 2012-08-08 18:09:01Z#925801

          Reminds me of a mind map.

          1. By Anonymous??, 2013-02-15 03:19:41Z#144245

            Does it ever become to complex for the users to handle?

            1. By KajMagnus, 2013-02-24 08:20:17Z#157896, improved , 2013-02-24 08:21:18Z

              For old people: Yes I suppose it might become too complex.

              For today's children that grow up with computers: Perhaps almost "no"?

      3. By Anonymous??, 2012-08-08 18:08:44Z#655326

        Very interesting.

        1. By Anonymous??, 2014-01-17 03:15:09Z#142

          nested reply?

          1. By Anonymous??, 2014-01-17 03:16:07Z#144

            not interesting. reply can only nest for 3 levels.

            1. By KajMagnus, 2014-01-18 01:33:55Z#145

              Replies can nest to any level. However if there's only 1 reply, then there's really no need to increase indentation — instead I'm simply placing the new reply directly below the old one.

              However, if there're 2 replies, then I show arrows and indent, since if they were placed directly below with no arrows, it wouldn't be clear which one replied to which.

            2. By KajMagnus, 2014-01-18 01:34:08Z#146

              Example of nested reply with arrows.

      4. Click to show this thread
  23. By Anonymous??, 2013-04-11 02:16:27Z#132776, rated mediocre
    2 ratings:
    1. mediocre 91%
    2. interesting 9%

    ?

  24. By sali??, 2013-03-24 14:05:06Z#252874, rated off-topic
    2 ratings:
    1. off-topic 91%
    2. interesting 9%

    Short comments that aren't in focus are marked as read, even though I didn't pay any attention to tem.

  25. By aaa??, 2013-08-16 06:27:25Z#130, rated mediocre
    1 ratings:
    1. mediocre 100%

    ssssssss

  26. By Anonymous??, 2013-03-24 11:23:54Z#129463, rated off-topic
    1 ratings:
    1. off-topic 100%

    This is a test.

  27. By Anonymous??, 2012-11-27 08:00:32Z#159550, rated off-topic
    1 ratings:
    1. off-topic 100%

    test

    1. By Anonymous??, 2013-02-25 10:20:58Z#181252

      ghnjk

      1. By Anonymous??, 2013-03-24 04:30:29Z#150607

        adfasfasf

  28. By Anonymous??, 2013-03-17 05:38:58Z#165014, rated faulty
    1 ratings:
    1. faulty 100%

    Wat

    1. By KajMagnus, 2013-03-19 08:11:32Z#258096

      What? "Wat" is no animal?

  29. By Anonymous??, 2013-03-24 00:57:56Z#174013, rated faulty
    1 ratings:
    1. faulty 100%

    Nice.

  30. By Anonymous??, 2013-03-24 02:54:34Z#236854, rated faulty
    1 ratings:
    1. faulty 100%

    ...

    1. By Anonymous??, 2013-03-24 02:54:41Z#982900, rated off-topic
      1 ratings:
      1. off-topic 100%

      jfgjfgj

  31. By Anonymous??, 2013-02-17 13:23:40Z#240315, rated off-topic
    1 ratings:
    1. off-topic 100%

    Gulp. Big one

  32. By Anonymous??, 2013-02-14 22:56:25Z#243118, rated off-topic
    1 ratings:
    1. off-topic 100%

    Test

  33. By Anonymous??, 2013-02-28 10:40:42Z#664163, rated faulty
    1 ratings:
    1. faulty 100%

    octopussquids

    1. Click to show this thread
    2. Click to show this thread
  34. By Anonymous??, 2012-11-09 20:41:05Z#207280, rated off-topic
    2 ratings:
    1. off-topic 100%

    new branch

    1. By Anonymous??, 2012-11-23 20:57:07Z#928991

      Cool interface

      1. By Anonymous??, 2013-03-17 05:39:12Z#140327, rated funny?
        1 ratings:
        1. funny 100%

        Ops?

        1. By Anonymous??, 2013-06-28 08:46:11Z#109

          funny

  35. By Anonymous??, 2012-11-24 04:40:44Z#212011, rated off-topic
    2 ratings:
    1. off-topic 100%

    Nifty

  36. By Anonymous??, 2012-11-12 12:34:57Z#384259, rated off-topic
    2 ratings:
    1. off-topic 100%

    test

  37. By Anonymous??, 2012-04-23 16:28:07Z#820689, rated off-topic
    2 ratings:
    1. off-topic 100%

    Test test

    1. By Anonymous?, 2012-04-23 16:30:46Z#989948, rated boring
      1 ratings:
      1. boring 100%

      More test

      1. By Anonymous?, 2012-04-23 16:31:40Z#56559, rated funny
        1 ratings:
        1. funny 100%

        Test 3

        1. By Anonymous?, 2012-04-23 16:32:18Z#224638, rated funny
          1 ratings:
          1. funny 100%

          Test 4

          1. By Arnonymous??, 2013-03-24 10:02:30Z#479451

            Test.. 2?

            1. By Anonymous??, 2013-05-29 19:59:36Z#83

              ll

              1. By Anonymous??, 2013-06-28 03:18:06Z#107

                wow?

  38. By Anonymous??, 2013-02-17 20:03:56Z#159147, rated off-topic
    4 ratings:
    1. off-topic 100%
    2. mediocre 20%

    test from reddit.

    1. By Anonymous??, 2013-02-26 07:18:45Z#209915, rated funny?, interesting?
      1 ratings:
      1. funny 100%
      2. interesting 100%

      bla bla

      1. By sali??, 2013-03-24 14:06:00Z#165498

        That's not very funny at all.

        1. By Anonymous??, 2014-02-09 20:26:01Z#149

          WJPA

          1. By Anonymous??, 2014-02-09 20:26:13Z#150

            ABBB

    2. By Anonymous??, 2013-03-11 13:34:52Z#4

      this is wow.

      1. By Anonymous??, 2013-03-14 23:02:07Z#5

        hej

    3. By Anonymous??, 2014-02-09 20:26:22Z#151

      test

    4. By Anonymous??, 2014-02-10 13:31:38Z#154

      I feel like a comments section shouldn't need a minimap.

      1. By KajMagnus, 2014-02-14 00:47:41Z#155

        I'd say that depends on the number of comments, and on the nature of the comments.

        This page is a forum topic, and the comment section is intended as the main contents of the page.

    5. By Anonymous??, 2013-02-18 07:26:12Z#714036, rated mediocre
      2 ratings:
      1. mediocre 91%
      2. interesting 9%

      Another Reddit test

  39. Click to show this thread, rated off-topic
    By Anonymous??, 2012-11-23 21:44:45Z#339791, rated off-topic
    5 ratings:
    1. off-topic 73%
    2. boring 24%
    3. interesting 2%

    Test

    1. By Anonymous??, 2012-11-23 22:40:27Z#127508, rated faulty
      1 ratings:
      1. faulty 100%

      Not a test

      1. By KajMagnus, 2013-03-01 15:44:03Z#1

        That was definitively a test

        1. By Anonymous??, 2013-03-14 23:03:14Z#6

          Don't lie!

You have been logged in, welcome Anonymous!

Login failed: unknown error

Be notified via email of replies to your comments?

You can select many rating tags.

You are changing your rating.



Submitting ...

Comments rated interesting, funny
Your post has no ratings, and was therefore placed below.
Comments rated boring, stupid
(Click this box to dismiss)